However, the Chicago authorities would eventually block these plans by requiring the NSPA to post a $350,000 public safety insurance bond and by banning political demonstrations in Marquette Park. Supreme Court decision opened the door to allowing the National Socialist Party of America to march.īefore the Skokie Affair, Frank Collin and his neo-Nazi group, the NSPA, would regularly hold demonstrations in Marquette Park, where the NSPA was headquartered. By requiring the state court to consider the neo-Nazis' appeal without delay, the U.S. In other words: the courts decided a person's assertion that speech is being restrained must be reviewed immediately by the judiciary. The Supreme Court's 1977 ruling granted certiorari and reversed and remanded the Illinois Supreme Court's denial to lift the lower court's injunction on the NSPA's march. Related court decisions are captioned Skokie v. This case is considered a "classic" free speech case in constitutional law classes. 43 (1977), arising out of what is sometimes referred to as the Skokie Affair, was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court dealing with freedom of speech and freedom of assembly. Absent such immediate review, the appellate court must grant a stay of any lower court order restricting the exercise of speech and assembly rights.Ĭhief Justice Warren E. If a state seeks to impose an injunction in the face of a substantial claim of First Amendment rights, it must provide strict procedural safeguards, including immediate appellate review.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |